BowlingFans.com, The site for the fans, by the fans....

Sponsored Links




Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#7794 - 03/04/01 03:22 PM 2001 Battle at Little Creek
usr bin geek Administrator Offline


Registered: 02/02/01
Posts: 1027
A/S/L: 32/m/Burlington, VT
You can tell that they put a lot of planning and effort into putting together an awesome venue for the tournament. In my opinion it was the most impressive one yet.

It really was shame the production crew dropped the ball (excuse the pun) so early on with bad audio mixing at the start of the show, only to be followed with more technical difficulties where there was no sound at all for a few minutes. This really isn't anything new as the production crew seemed to have problems this entire swing. They really don't seem like they're capable of pulling off live broadcasts without problems.

P.S. Don't read this and think that starting a writing campaign to ESPN will help solve things. In fact writing ESPN would be the WORST thing to do because they're not responsible for the production and it would only reflect badly on the PBA and bowling in general!

[ 03-06-2001: Edited: Steve M ]
_________________________
Steve Mermelstein
BowlingFans.com Founder

Since your questions may also be of benefit to others please post them to the board.

#!/usr/bin/geek
My Amazon.com Wishlist

Top
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Member
*****

Registered: 27/08/04
Posts: 10136
Loc: Mountain View, CA
Top
#7795 - 03/04/01 05:12 PM Re: 2001 Battle at Little Creek
George Freeman Offline
Bracket Donator

Registered: 02/08/01
Posts: 113
A/S/L: Florida
I'll be happy to see the regular format come back. A tournament like this focuses more on who you bowl when rather than how well you bowl in relation to the rest of the field. A bowler could have shot 268-279, but if his opponent shot 270-290, he is out of the whole tournament, even if those 2 bowlers were the only ones to break 210 those 2 games. The concept is diffrent, yes, but it is flawed. Luck of the draw becomes more a factor than the actual skill of the players as a whole. The original format is much better.

However, the original format is not without its downfalls either. A player can lead a 56 game format by 500+ pins, lose one match, and come in second place. It's happened before, and perhaps the best solution lies between these two formats. However, given the 2 choices, I'd have to say the original format comes out way ahead. :p
_________________________
George Freeman

Top
#7796 - 03/05/01 03:15 PM Re: 2001 Battle at Little Creek
Rocket Jr Coordinator Offline


Registered: 02/08/01
Posts: 32
A/S/L: SoCal
I prefer the regular format, and I definitely would have prefered to see more matches on the telecast. I found myself walking out of the room during the interviews and other stuff. But for variety, it was very interesting, and I definitely like the idea of the fan vote. smile

While I agree that lay people need to know about the bowlers, and agree with several of the points made by PBA commissioner, I'd definitely rather see more BOWLING than talk.

Now we have to wait til September for more bowling *sigh*

Top
#7797 - 03/06/01 02:01 PM Re: 2001 Battle at Little Creek
Express Offline
League Bowler

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 78
A/S/L: Alanta, GA
I had to laugh at the interview they had with the commissioner. His little speech would have been better made at an industry convention and not to bowlers. This guy has to realize who he is speaking to and change his verbiage and message.

Top


BowlingCommunity.com Recent Posts
question about a equipment change.
by infernocal - 2 seconds ago
Fall/Winter Leagues 2008
by tbill - Today at 09:03 AM
What'd You bowl today?
by Dennis Michael - Today at 08:13 AM
Release Problems
by PygmyBBQ - Today at 03:30 AM
What I Learned Playing a Different House
by JedC - Today at 01:30 AM
Buffer...machine washable??
by SilentTuba - Yesterday at 11:33 PM
Which ball should I get?
by willypbowler1 - Yesterday at 08:55 PM
Need help with my rev rate. Help!
by Atochabsh - Yesterday at 07:17 PM
A little gloating and a ball question...
by infernocal - Yesterday at 05:43 PM
A highly technical topic about ball rotation
by cgeorg - Yesterday at 02:56 PM
Maybe a record?
by saabbowler - Yesterday at 12:38 PM
Working the inside part of the ball.
by eastwest - Yesterday at 10:05 AM
finger pitches
by cgeorg - Yesterday at 08:58 AM
Linds Shoes no longer legal in the PBA???
by Mkirchie - Yesterday at 08:32 AM
Specific type of finger insert wear
by Dennis Michael - Yesterday at 08:14 AM
Who's Online
4 registered (BIGHMW, infernocal, Time-To-Roll, ttopmustanggt88), 35 Guests and 8 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Top Posters
Atochabsh 4045
Dennis Michael 3198
CoachJim 2082
infernocal 1883
Lefty 1796
Brandon510 1743
Tim Gerard 1369
cgeorg 1296
Brian Longo 1275
General Pounder 1249
Terms Of Use
Use of this community signifies your agreement to the Community Standards.



About BowlingFans.com | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy
Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Conditions of Use.

Copyright © 1998 - 2008 - BowlingFans.com or its affiliates.
BowlingFans.com, BowlingFans, The Right Approach, Kegler's Connection, Tour411, BallBeat, BowlingCommunity.com, BowlSearch.com, and Bowling News You Can Use are trademarks of BowlingFans.com. All other trademarks and tradenames are property of their respective owners.