what do you think is harder to do a perfect 300 game ,or a max 147 at snooker,9 dart finnish at darts.or anything else you can think of? the 7-10 split or a hole in one at golf?

A 147 at snooker is red, black, red, black, etc., and then the rest of the colored balls? I'd say that's pretty hard. Probably harder than a 300. Allison Fisher might disagree, but who knows.

The frequency of a hole-in-one is probably less often compared to bowling, but even terrible golfers can get a hole-in-one. Terrible bowlers aren't going to throw 12 strikes in a row.

Tim

300 doesn't rank all that high up on the difficulty list. There were 48,674 sanctioned 300's last year. You'd be better off using 800.. there were only 15,348 of those last season.

i see, what about the 7-10 split.how hard id that?
i asked a few snooker players and they said that they were closer to a 147, but got no where near a 300 in bowling.i see what you mean with a 800 but thats a lot of frames.but saying that 147 is a lot of balls......37 balls i think?and with snooker if you are out of position you have a chance at a nother ball.if you miss in bowling thats it.

A 147 is 36 shots, the same as a 900 series...

i play all three games and have to admit that snooker is the hardest.Not really sure if a 9 darter is easier/harder then a 300 at bowling.
my high game is a 278 and threw a few 12 darters.
All comes down to holding your nerve in the end.

so everyone is saying that a 300 is alot easyer than the 147? yes ill go along with that. thanks everyone i think ill put this one to rest now.